TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Roma 14:17

Konteks
14:17 For the kingdom of God does not consist of food and drink, but righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.

Yesaya 55:12

Konteks

55:12 Indeed you will go out with joy;

you will be led along in peace;

the mountains and hills will give a joyful shout before you,

and all the trees in the field will clap their hands.

Yohanes 14:1

Konteks
Jesus’ Parting Words to His Disciples

14:1 “Do not let your hearts be distressed. 1  You believe in God; 2  believe also in me.

Yohanes 14:27

Konteks

14:27 “Peace I leave with you; 3  my peace I give to you; I do not give it 4  to you as the world does. 5  Do not let your hearts be distressed or lacking in courage. 6 

Galatia 5:22

Konteks

5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit 7  is love, 8  joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 9 

Efesus 1:2

Konteks
1:2 Grace and peace to you 10  from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ!

Efesus 5:18-19

Konteks
5:18 And do not get drunk with wine, which 11  is debauchery, 12  but be filled by the Spirit, 13  5:19 speaking to one another in psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, singing and making music 14  in 15  your hearts to the Lord,

Efesus 5:2

Konteks
5:2 and live 16  in love, just as Christ also loved us 17  and gave himself for us, a sacrificial and fragrant offering 18  to God.

Efesus 2:16-17

Konteks
2:16 and to reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, by which the hostility has been killed. 19  2:17 And he came and preached peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near,

Efesus 2:1

Konteks
New Life Individually

2:1 And although you were 20  dead 21  in your transgressions and sins,

Pengkhotbah 1:8

Konteks

1:8 All this 22  monotony 23  is tiresome; no one can bear 24  to describe it: 25 

The eye is never satisfied with seeing, nor is the ear ever content 26  with hearing.

Seret untuk mengatur ukuranSeret untuk mengatur ukuran

[14:1]  1 sn The same verb is used to describe Jesus’ own state in John 11:33, 12:27, and 13:21. Jesus is looking ahead to the events of the evening and the next day, his arrest, trials, crucifixion, and death, which will cause his disciples extreme emotional distress.

[14:1]  2 tn Or “Believe in God.” The translation of the two uses of πιστεύετε (pisteuete) is difficult. Both may be either indicative or imperative, and as L. Morris points out (John [NICNT], 637), this results in a bewildering variety of possibilities. To complicate matters further, the first may be understood as a question: “Do you believe in God? Believe also in me.” Morris argues against the KJV translation which renders the first πιστεύετε as indicative and the second as imperative on the grounds that for the writer of the Fourth Gospel, faith in Jesus is inseparable from faith in God. But this is precisely the point that Jesus is addressing in context. He is about to undergo rejection by his own people as their Messiah. The disciples’ faith in him as Messiah and Lord would be cast into extreme doubt by these events, which the author makes clear were not at this time foreseen by the disciples. After the resurrection it is this identification between Jesus and the Father which needs to be reaffirmed (cf. John 20:24-29). Thus it seems best to take the first πιστεύετε as indicative and the second as imperative, producing the translation “You believe in God; believe also in me.”

[14:27]  3 sn Peace I leave with you. In spite of appearances, this verse does not introduce a new subject (peace). Jesus will use the phrase as a greeting to his disciples after his resurrection (20:19, 21, 26). It is here a reflection of the Hebrew shalom as a farewell. But Jesus says he leaves peace with his disciples. This should probably be understood ultimately in terms of the indwelling of the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, who has been the topic of the preceding verses. It is his presence, after Jesus has left the disciples and finally returned to the Father, which will remain with them and comfort them.

[14:27]  4 tn The pronoun “it” is not in the Greek text, but has been supplied. Direct objects in Greek were often omitted when clear from the context.

[14:27]  5 tn Grk “not as the world gives do I give to you.”

[14:27]  6 tn Or “distressed or fearful and cowardly.”

[5:22]  7 tn That is, the fruit the Spirit produces.

[5:22]  8 sn Another way to punctuate this is “love” followed by a colon (love: joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control). It is thus possible to read the eight characteristics following “love” as defining love.

[5:22]  9 tn Or “reliability”; see BDAG 818 s.v. πίστις 1.a.

[1:2]  10 tn Grk “Grace to you and peace.”

[5:18]  11 tn Grk “in which.”

[5:18]  12 tn Or “dissipation.” See BDAG 148 s.v. ἀσωτία.

[5:18]  13 tn Many have taken ἐν πνεύματι (en pneumati) as indicating content, i.e., one is to be filled with the Spirit. ExSyn 375 states, “There are no other examples in biblical Greek in which ἐν + the dative after πληρόω indicates content. Further, the parallel with οἴνῳ as well as the common grammatical category of means suggest that the idea intended is that believers are to be filled by means of the [Holy] Spirit. If so there seems to be an unnamed agent. The meaning of this text can only be fully appreciated in light of the πληρόω language in Ephesians. Always the term is used in connection with a member of the Trinity. Three considerations seem to be key: (1) In Eph 3:19 the ‘hinge’ prayer introducing the last half of the letter makes a request that the believers ‘be filled with all the fullness of God’ (πληρωθῆτε εἰς πᾶν πλήρωμα τοῦ θεοῦ). The explicit content of πληρόω is thus God’s fullness (probably a reference to his moral attributes). (2) In 4:10 Christ is said to be the agent of filling (with v. 11 adding the specifics of his giving spiritual gifts). (3) The author then brings his argument to a crescendo in 5:18: Believers are to be filled by Christ by means of the Spirit with the content of the fullness of God.”

[5:19]  14 tn See BDAG 1096 s.v. ψάλλω.

[5:19]  15 tn Or “with.”

[5:2]  16 tn Grk “walk.” The NT writers often used the verb “walk” (περιπατέω, peripatew) to refer to ethical conduct (cf. Rom 8:4; Gal 5:16; Col 4:5).

[5:2]  17 tc A number of important witnesses have ὑμᾶς (Jumas, “you”; e.g., א* A B P 0159 81 1175 al it co as well as several fathers). Other, equally important witnesses read ἡμᾶς (Jhmas, “us”; Ì46 א2 D F G Ψ 0278 33 1739 1881 al lat sy). It is possible that ἡμᾶς was accidentally introduced via homoioarcton with the previous word (ἠγάπησεν, hgaphsen). On the other hand, ὑμᾶς may have been motivated by the preceding ὑμῖν (Jumin) in 4:32 and second person verbs in 5:1, 2. Further, the flow of argument seems to require the first person pronoun. A decision is difficult to make, but the first person pronoun has a slightly greater probability of being original.

[5:2]  18 tn Grk “an offering and sacrifice to God as a smell of fragrance.” The first expression, προσφορὰν καὶ θυσίαν (prosforan kai qusian), is probably a hendiadys and has been translated such that “sacrificial” modifies “offering.” The second expression, εἰς ὀσμὴν εὐωδίας (ei" osmhn euwdia", “as a smell of fragrance”) has been translated as “a fragrant offering”; see BDAG 728-29 s.v. ὀσμή 2. Putting these two together in a clear fashion in English yields the translation: “a sacrificial and fragrant offering to God.”

[2:16]  19 tn Grk “by killing the hostility in himself.”

[2:1]  20 tn The adverbial participle “being” (ὄντας, ontas) is taken concessively.

[2:1]  21 sn Chapter 2 starts off with a participle, although you were dead, that is left dangling. The syntax in Greek for vv. 1-3 constitutes one incomplete sentence, though it seems to have been done intentionally. The dangling participle leaves the readers in suspense while they wait for the solution (in v. 4) to their spiritual dilemma.

[1:8]  22 tn The word “this” is not in Hebrew, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.

[1:8]  23 tn Heb “the things.” The Hebrew term דְּבָרִים (dÿvarim, masculine plural noun from דָּבָר, davar) is often used to denote “words,” but it can also refer to actions and events (HALOT 211 s.v. דָּבָר 3.a; BDB 183 s.v. דָּבָר IV.4). Here, it means “things,” as is clear from the context: “What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done” (1:9). Here דְּבָרִים can be nuanced “occurrences” or even “[natural] phenomena.”

[1:8]  24 tn Heb “is able.”

[1:8]  25 tn The Hebrew text has no stated object. The translation supplies “it” for stylistic reasons and clarification.

[1:8]  sn The statement no one can bear to describe it probably means that Qoheleth could have multiplied examples (beyond the sun, the wind, and the streams) of the endless cycle of futile events in nature. However, no tongue could ever tell, no eye could ever see, no ear could ever hear all the examples of this continual and futile activity.

[1:8]  26 tn The term מָלֵא (male’, “to be filled, to be satisfied”) is repeated in 1:7-8 to draw a comparison between the futility in the cycle of nature and human secular accomplishments: lots of action, but no lasting effects. In 1:7 אֵינֶנּוּ מָלֵא (’enennu male’, “it is never filled”) describes the futility of the water cycle: “All the rivers flow into the sea, yet the sea is never filled.” In 1:8 וְלֹא־תִמָּלֵא (vÿlo-timmale’, “it is never satisfied”) describes the futility of human labor: “the ear is never satisfied with hearing.”



TIP #03: Coba gunakan operator (AND, OR, NOT, ALL, ANY) untuk menyaring pencarian Anda. [SEMUA]
dibuat dalam 0.03 detik
dipersembahkan oleh YLSA